SHAH ALAM: Upgraded Nuri in flight testing. In my post on the Nuri upgrade on October 14, 2016, I wrongly stated that the upgrade work on the Nuri will be done in Norway. In fact, the work was and being done locally, at the Airod hangar located inside the Subang airbase and next to it’s flightline.
The hangar was previously used by SME Aviation to build the Aerotiga trainer aircraft. Following the end of the program, Airod had repurposed it as the MRO facility for the Nuri and AW109 of the Army Aviation Air Wing (PUTD). Previously, these helicopters were maintained in one of the hangars in the main Airod complex next to the Subang airport.
Work to upgrade the Nuri – M23-37 – started in the last quarter of 2016, under the auspices of the Letter of Instruction for proof of concept for the avionics upgrade programme for Nuri helicopters, awarded at the DSA 2016 in April 2016
The modification for the first aircraft involved the installation of new cockpit displays including a new flight management system and a search radar. Work on the aircraft apparently has been completed and the helicopter is currently undergoing flight tests as seen from some of the pictures here.
If all goes well, the helicopter is expected to be handed over to the RMAF at LIMA 17. And if RMAF is satisfied and funds are available, Airod could be awarded the contract to install similar modifications on all of the Nuri in its fleet and probably those under the Army Air Wing as well.
According to Airod, the modifications will
add new tactical capabilities and allow for standardisation of aircraft systems across the fleet. It will enable the aircraft to fly in day and night under all weather conditions as well as address obsolescence issues, subsequently, allow the RMAF S61A-4 NURI helicopter to expand its lifespan for at least another 15 years
As for the other Nuri helicopter fitted with a digital cockpit -M23-36 – it is still undergoing repairs at the Subang airbase. The helicopter had a hard landing on Aug. 13, 2016, at Bukit Beruntung, Selangor, after it lost power while taking off from a field at the police training centre there. The aircraft was fitted with a digital cockpit from another vendor – Vector Aerospace – at the same hangar as the Nuri with the tail number 37.
Meanwhile, most of the RMAF EC725 Cougar fleet is currently undergoing its three-year inspection, it was revealed during a visit to the Airbus Helicopters facility in Subang on March 10. As the helicopters were delivered in small batches within a short period of time – November 2012 to early 2014 – their three-year inspection period came almost simultaneously since late last year.
The mandatory three-year inspection takes a minimum of two months hence it is a crunch time for the BHIC Aeroservices Sdn Bhd, the company contracted for the Cougar MRO. BHIC Aeroservices is a joint-venture between BHIC Defence Technologies Sdn Bhd, a subsidiary of public listed Boustead Heavy Industries Corp Bhd, Prestige Pillar Sdn Bhd and Airbus Helicopters Malaysia Sdn Bhd.
During the visit to Airbus Helicopters, journalists were allowed into BHIC Aeroservices hangar to see the Cougars undergoing their servicing. However, no photography was allowed at the hangar. We were told that some of the Cougars undergoing servicing are expected to be available for duties very soon.
Meanwhile, the fifth EC120B for Pulatibang 2 has been delivered to Airbus Helicopters to be fitted with a glass cockpit. The upgrading work on the aircraft is expected to take two months. Once delivered, Pulatibang 2 will have all of its five EC120Bs for flight training which is leased from Gading Kasturi Sdn Bhd. The fourth EC120B for Pulatibang 2 was delivered recently. For more on the Colibiris go here and here
At the same hangar, an AS355N Ecureuil 2 helicopter of the Police Air Wing was also undergoing final checks. The helicopter – 9M-PHG – was damaged in a hard landing near Kuching on July 6, 2010, although the crew escaped with minor injuries.
Following a survey, it was decided the aircraft could be rebuild although it was already had seen service for two decades. It has been seven years since the hard landing and only now the helicopter is about ready to return to service. As usual, the wheels of bureaucracy takes a long time to get moving.
* updated throughout for clarity.
— Malaysian Defence.
If you like this post, buy me an espresso. Paypal Payment
View Comments (21)
I've been watch bloomberg news few weeks ago and they said Malaysia export were increase double which include better economy like unemployement reduce, more affordable property, EV charging station, and others idk. However, still cutting military budget? What kinda budget planning is this? Hmm... i guess oil are anything but Australia never rely on oil for it's economy.
Reply
Those are other things not connected with defence
I've read that MMEA is looking for more helos for CSAR around Sabah west coast in the wake of fatal tragedy of capsized catamaran about a month ago
I hope more AW139 (or the larger AW149) could be acquired for MMEA. These helos could be used in CSAR as well as offshore patrol and even courtesy flight from labuan to KK (since Labuan hospital still couldn't handle major cases)
Also, it might be tad overambitious a bit, but we could build a helo assembly plant in Malaysia. There are so much demands for helos not only for the military but also other agencies and private sectors and right now the government is keen on riding the aerospace bandwagon as the next stage of industrial transformation
Reply
While I agree that MMEA needs more helos, l totally disagree with local assembly. It will just increase the cost of the helicopters. Tiga Paku will definitely point out that a lot of used 225s available out there. Actually helicopters are expensive to maintain and operate, MMEA could well used cheap single engine fixed wing aircraft for SAR actually, one with a cargo door which can drop rescue raft for survivors and GPS markers for bodies.
I agree with marhalim's view on SAR.
For initial SAR, we should use a small fixed wing aircraft, preferably with automatic optical search equipment like the VIDAR. These would have longer endurance and cheaper operating costs than a helicopter. A rescue pack with inflatable raft, food and aid kit can be hung under the wing on a pylon or just thrown out of the aircraft through an open door.
http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s480x480/e35/c4.0.791.791/17075828_416376118709431_5397048589824294912_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTQ2MTc4NDI2NTk1NTg0NjIwOQ%3D%3D.2.c
Afer the srvivor is found then a helicopter could be launched for the rescue.
BTW why do they need 2 months to fit the simple plug and play Aspen Glass cockpits to the EC120? It should be just 1 week tops as the system already designed to fit seamlessly into the EC120. The system just has 2 small displays and uses all the existing wirings.
This is the system that is fitted:
https://www.aspenavionics.com/products/helicopters
Reply
Didn't I say the wheels of bureaucracy moves slowly?
Local assembly of aircraft will provide us with no future tangible benefits and the cost for setting up the assembly line and acquiring the rights for assembly will be pushed to the taxpayer.
Rippie,
It's no revelation. For the past few decades the military budget is always the first to be trimmed when the economy slows down. The plain fact is that defence is not and never was a priority as we don't feel the threat environment justifies it. There is a simple reason why Australia doesn't [unlike Malaysia] ''rely on oil for it’s economy'' .....
Marhalim,
Of course they are not connect to defence. The Gov got money for ECRL project, land development, and others. However, never had money for increase military budget? Even Indonesia GDP has slightly reduce but at least they got money for increase military budget.
Also yeah, regional balance are stability for they country and it's neighbour which include economy. If Saudi want to sell it's F-15 to us then they make sure follow this 2 condition:
1. They must have approved from US Congress in order to sell US made jet to other nation. Rather 2nd handed or not.
2. Make sure they country and it's neighbour stable. Including Economy stable.
However, Saudi are now war with Insurgent Shia Houthi in Yemen which highly chance Houthi would destabilize Saudi by targeting it's key structure like oil production. If they success then Saudi economy will be cripple and if they sell US made jet to other nation then highly chance that Iran gonna steal it and reverse engineered quietly. What this to do with us and the selling of Saudi jet? If you not understand well here's the answer: F-15SA has been used mostly Saudi which they are become their highly assets and very advance jet in their Air Forces. So, US Congress will need Royal Saudi Air Forced with F-15SA. So, if they want to sell then they approved by US Congress. Also yeah, F-15 are costly. Many people won't agree that Malaysia buying F-15.
Reply
Please note that Indonesia defence budget for 2017 is lower this year. it was lower also in 2016. If the Saudis want to sell their F-15Cs to Malaysia (though very unlikely) it is likely the US will approve it. Why? The Singapore F-15SGs are way more advanced than the Saudis F-15Cs.
Do our EC725 have electronic warfare system (lwr, rwr, maw) n countermeasure dispenser? Seems like it doesnt have it.
And is it better for army aviation to use h225m or aw139m or aw149 in the far future? Since h225m is essentially our air force ec725 and both aw139 n aw189 (149 commercial version) are used by our civil agencies.
Reply
H225M is the new designation for EC725 which is still used by RMAF. The RMAF Cougars are fitted for but not (paid) fitted with the DAS.
As for which new helicopters the Army should get, it will depend on the requirements which AFAIK its not yet set on stone
Marhalim is absolutely right. In the unlikely event that Saudi decides to sell/transfer/donate/gift F-15s; there is no reason why the U.S. would object. It's not as if a few F-15s will alter the regional balance of power or will contain technology not already in use by others in the region.
The real issue about the F-15s is not the politics or the bureaucracy involved but rather the fact that the RMAF has no need for another heavyweight twin engine fighter and that introducing F-15s in service will increase the RMAF's logistical/support footprint.
Talking about fighters, Rafale and Gripen will be performing at LIMA. Typhoon will not.
Reply
Typhoon have not taken part since 2013.
For this year's LIMA, the russian aerobatic team will be using the SU-30SM as their mount. So lets see if the TUDM SU-30MKM team could outdo the russians this year!
Reply
It will difficult actually as the Russian team will perform with five aircraft while the MKM demo will be a single aircraft