SHAH ALAM: A walk on part…. It appears that KD Jebat is set to get a new “brain” as it enters the 20th year anniversary in the RMN. The new brain is of course the locally developed Vibrant 1 combat management system.
As reported previously the Vibrant 1 CMS had been selected by Boustead Naval Shipyard last year to be installed on the Jebat as part of its refit work. The CMS was developed by local company, Marine Crest Technology Bhd with inputs from Indian firm, C2C-DB Systems Pvt Ltd. For further details go here.
On May 16, RMN’s Fleet Engineering Authority posted on its social media that it conducted the Factory Acceptance Test for the software of Vibrant 1 CMS. The console/workstation looked the same as the one displayed at LIMA 19. It did not state when the CMS will actually be installed on Jebat, however.
It must be noted that the Jebat and its sister ship KD Lekiu, have had a programme to replace some of its equipment within the last three years, including the Thales Vigile 100 Mk2 ESM replacing the BAE Mentor A; Chess Dynamics Sea Eagle FCEO replacing the BAE Type V 3001 and a new navigation radar, the Terma Scanter 6000.
The CMS will be the most significant upgrade though it remained unclear whether it will also be extended to Lekiu, though it is most likely. There is no word at all on the replacement for the VL Seawolf SAM though.
As whether or not, the CMS will be able to support the Jebat’s guided weapons, I guess we will have to wait until RMN conducts a firing exercise later this year.
— Malaysian Defence
If you like this post, buy me an espresso. Paypal Payment
View Comments (19)
Factory acceptance test is just that, switching on the system at the factory and making sure it works.
The real test would be when it is actually installed on the ship and networked with all the radar, EO, ESM and weapons.
I have been wondering whether the Aspide system in the laksamana has been "relife"thus no need to be replaced yet..or is it just the firing canisters not removed but the system actually not working. Well if it is the former, maybe the same can be done for the Seawolf missiles?
Reply
It's the latter actually
Thank You Sir for the update
Local or import yg beza hanya harganya..yg penting sistem itu dapat dikendalikan dgn lebih mudah dan berkesan...bukan sekadar kecanggihan sahaja tetapi berkesan kepada operator yg mengendalikannya.Jgn hanya canggih pada kertas sahaja (paper work) ...Sistem perlu lebih ' friendly user' agar operator baru lebih mudah mengendalikan tanpa rujukan Manual ketika keadaan mendesak.
Reply
The SOP is to use the manual in all circumstances, the problem I am told with this kind of things people tend to disregard the manual and do their own stuff...
kamal,
There are only so many times one can “relife” a missile. The MM-38s were first done at the Naval Dockyard and later at Pakistan - twice. The Otomats and Aspides we got were from Italian navy stocks. Plenty of live left then but not “new”.
With Seawolf we have bought spares before but not sure if we have actually “relifed” them before. I don’t think so for the reason there was no need. The questions really are whether they can - from a technical perspective - be worked on at this late stage in their lives and whether MBDA is willing to do it. The first to go is usually the propellant followed by the circuitry.
"inputs from Indian firm, C2C-DB Systems Pvt Ltd"
Is this a good way in telling that it was developed in India and just "locally rebadged?" I would be really disappointed if this were true. Not surprised but still disappointed nonetheless.
BTW Marhalim, word in FB going around that RMAF (or Mindef?) is looking at doing a deal of RM 36Billion for the LCA project with FA-50, Tejas, JF-17, and YAK-130 as contenders. This we already known, but what's more interesting that these are being lobbied by unheard/newly formed companies and no more G-to-G. Any take on this?
Reply
Stupid story
This is PTU reply
http://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/05/490419/rmaf-chief-rubbishes-report-procurement-package-30-jets
IMO one of the most important info from the news:
" The New Straits Times learnt the Defence Ministry was looking at a procurement package of possibly up to only RM7 billion, in view of economic constraints "
So that is the budget that they are allowed to plan for (but not necessarily already allocated for).
Indeed it is a ridiculous figure, more suited for 30 Eurofighter Typhoons than 30 jet trainers.
@ chua
That happens when someone who have no clue of the military writes something about it (and IMO fringes on acting like a traitor to malaysia as the ST writer is a malaysian)
Even South Korea bought 40 F-35A for only RM29 billion (USD 6.8 billion)
http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20190329000542
Looks like we are helping the Indians develop their CMS for their aircraft carrier. Maybe it will integrate with Brahmos at least.
https://www.navalnews.com/event-news/lima-2019/2019/04/marine-crest-technology-indigenous-cms-for-malaysian-lekiu-class-frigates/
Reply
What ever was reported there is no way they are using the core software of the Indian Navy, the company will not be allowed to do that. How are we going to integrate the Brahmos when there is no plans to buy the missiles?